Wednesday, 25 November 2009

Panopticism

1. What is the major effect of the Panopticon?

The Panopticon is a building that was designed using the principles of Michael Foucault's theory of Panopticism. The building is designed in such a way that the occupants feel they are under constant surveillance, even though this may, or may not be the case. The effect of this is that, over time, the occupant will begin to govern themselves internally, based on the threat that they could be being watched.

2. How does the architecture (institution) create and sustain a power relation, independent of the person that exercises it?

The control element of the Panopticon is based more on the threat of surveillance, rather than the actual surveillance itself. There doesn't actually have to be anyone watching, as long as the occupant believes this to be the case. In the Panopticon, the cells of the prison were all facing a central tower, which used lighting and blinds in such a way that the guards could see out, but the prisoners could not see in. This meant that the element of control could be carried out entirely independent of the guards.

3. In what way is the Panopticon efficient?

The Panopticon is efficient as the prison need never employ any guards, or at least it could only have one guard on duty at any given time. As long as the illusion that there is always guards in the tower is never broken, the effect will be the same.

4. How does Panopticism do the work of a naturalist (scientist)?

Panopticism can do this by using the constant surveillance to study human behavior. It can also be used to monitor and adjust behaviors, and carry out social experiments. For example, in an educational environment it could be used to monitor the performance of individual students. This information can then be used to tailor the teaching methods to fit each students learning style.

5. In what ways was the Panopticon a laboratory?

As mentioned in the answer to the previous question, the Panopticon was an ideal place to study human behavior. If the occupants are seen as the subject of an experiment, rather than inmates, then the person in the tower can study, or even manipulate their behavior to obtain different results.

6. List the conditions in which Panopticism strengthens power.

  1. The individuals the hold the power can be very few in number, but depending on the surveillance method, a far greater number of people can be affected by it. If you add to this the fact that the holder of the power need not even be present to exercise it, this is a very powerful method.
  2. It acts as a preventative measure. As the threat of constantly being watched causes the individual to self govern, this means that crimes and offenses are much less likely to occur.
  3. The instruments it uses to exercise control can be few, or perhaps not even physical. The principle of Panopticism is based more on the threat of being watched rather than the actually watching itself. This means that the power is almost intangible, as it can exist purely in the minds of the affected.
7. According to Julius (1831) how is the Panoptic principle particularly useful in a society made of private individuals and the state?

Julius believed that the Panopticon was more than just architectural ingenuity, but brought forward a new type of society. In the past, society had been more about spectacle, whereby the masses congregated and became one whole body. Julius said that spectacle could be used "To render access to a multitude of men the inspection of a small number of objects". Panopticism allowed the reverse of this whereby a small number of individuals could view the masses. This was useful in terms of the state, as they are a small number of individuals and private individuals represent the masses. The state can therefore only relate to the masses by use of panopticism.

8. Also according to Julius, rather than suppress the individual, what effect does the panoptic principle have?

Julius believed that instead of being repressed by panopticsim, we are gradually fabricated within it. This means that the constant surveillance manufactures who we are, according to the will of the state. Just as in the panopticon, the guards in the tower can control and amend the prisoners behavior, the state can do the same with us under the threat that we are all being watched.


2 comments:

  1. Hi Tim, well done for completing this task. Seems you clearly understand panopticism. However, it will be interesting to know your views on whether this is a useful tool in terms of the analysis of the IPA? Place your views on this and join the other critical debates in the Moodle Forum (titled portoflio weekly tasks). Hopefully you will be able to catch up with some (if not all)of the other tasks this week. As this blog (portfolio) is assessed, make sure that it reflects your contributions and understanding that you express in the face-2-face seminars. Best regards, Janine.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The first formative assessment was completed today. I have given you a mark for your completion of the Panopticism task and your contributions in seminar discussions. Your standard of work within these two aspects will be discussed later. You will receive feedback by email and this will be the focus of a tutorial in the first session (13th Jan) in the New Year.
    Best wishes,
    Janine

    ReplyDelete